Ernie Ball’s CEO on dumping Microsoft

Very interesting interview looking at going the open source route from a business, not technical, perspective. Seems that when the BSA, the bad guys who went around auditing companies’ PCs (think earlier iteration of the jokers at the RIAA if you don’t remember), targeted Sterling Ball’s company, they made a poor choice. Ball made the smart decision not to fight them but when they left he tossed out his Microsoft software and installed Linux and other open source apps instead; it’s been three and a half years and that choice has worked just fine.

This week’s Spencer Katt column adds a little OSS mirth by relating a rumor that several companies which use Linux are banding together to file a racketeering lawsuit against the idiots at SCO. I say go get’em!

Morning laughers

  • Putting his money where his mouth is: Kirkland’s dad hopes for payback time. When the Liverpool goalkeeper was about 10, his dad went down to the local bookie with nine friends and the each put up 100 pounds at 100-1 odds that Chris would one day play for the English national team. With the England-Croatia match this week, that bet might just pay off.
  • Still Fair and Balanced: Paul Newman Is Still HUD. The great actor pulls a Franken on Fox News.
  • The Surreal Life: Headers and Soul. Marks marklarks the marklark, if you know what I marklark.

Afternoon update:

Rob works at the company which makes the operating system running on his laptop. Said operating system seems to have reached a critical negative juncture in it’s life, giving off strange messages when he powers on. Yet he seems oddly reluctant to call tech support. What’s up with that? But Rob, still, thanks for the positive feedback on my little project.

Fussy about details

Harve Bennett was as responsible as anyone other than Gene Roddenberry for the rebirth of the Star Trek franchise back in the 1970s so I generally take what he has to say at face value. Sometimes, though, he pops one up and out of play behind the plate as in a recent interview. Bennett says he likes the idea of a new Trek series idea that has made the rounds for a few years now: Kirk and Spock as 17 year olds at Star Trek Academy.

All well and good, possibly an interesting reboot even, except for one little detail: Spock is something like 100 years older than Kirk! I realize we’re talking about fictional characters but if they want to play by the rules than this is a pretty crucial one to follow. A large part of Spock’s backstory in the original series comes from his age and prior experiences. Indeed, if the ratings get dire enough, I wouldn’t be at all surprised to see a very young Spock pop up as a character on Enterprise even though this would be something of a continuity violation.

Sorry Harve. A series set at the Academy might work just fine and even one where young Kirk is the lead character. Just leave Spock’s pointy ears out of it, knowwhatImean?

Yesterday’s movie: The Magnificent Seven

There are only seven basic stories for writers to use and Hollywood ranks the Hero’s Tale right at the top; my favorite genre or at least far ahead of Boy Meets Girl. So I was quite interested when TV Guide mentioned that one such film I’d never seen but which has all kinds of great press, 1960’sThe Magnificent Seven, was going to be shown on commercial-free Turner Classic Movies. This is a film that spawned three or four sequels, a couple of variations, and a TV series. One of the last of the classic Hollywood westerns, Magnificent Seven is itself based on a another film, a Japanese classic called Shichinin No Samurai from Akira Kurosawa.

A Mexican village, a few miles on the other side of the Texas border, is hounded year after year by a bandit and his gang until the farmers decide enough’s enough. Riding up to some no name Texas town seeking guns and ammunition, they find instead two brave gunmen (Yul Brynner and Steve McQueen) and hire them instead. The gunfighters recruit four more and a wannabe insists on joining them to make the seven. Once the crew reaches the village, there is only enough time for a little training before the bandidos attack. The story itself is hardly surprising to anyone who’s seen more than three Westerns or really any three decent Hollywood action films.

What makes it stand out so much is that so many elements come together so well. The actors really inhabit the characters, while the script treats the characters with respect rather than as objects to move the plot. The director lets the script breathe and gives the actors space. About the only artificial feeling I got was from the sets, especially the Mexican village, which were a little too obviously built on a tight budget. The villagers are a good example of what I mean; in most movies their characters would have been the objects of condescension but Brynner as the leader of the hired guns talks with them and makes them a part of the plan.

I’m not surprised since the director is John Sturges, who went on to make one of my all time favorites three years later, The Great Escape. And Steve McQueen, when his A game is on, is always a treat. The ending might seem like a bit of a letdown but I saw it as realistic.

Recommended

Obesity: Personal responsibility?

Falling asleep last night, mind wandering everywhere from finances to databases to disease, I began wondering about obesity and disease. That is, won’t the current epidemic cause lots of health problems for, well, for us? I’m still covered by that description even after losing 53 pounds, I guess, and ought to be honest; I plan to keep at the weight loss until I reach a healthy size, then follow the Atkins maintenance guidelines. But back to the question at hand…

I look around today and see chubby kids, hefty teens, and huge adults and can’t help but wonder how people let themselves get that way. I honestly don’t know myself how I did except that the thought just never occured to me even as I kept needing larger and larger clothes. Thankfully friends and loved ones didn’t let me off the hook but kept asking me when I was going to do something about it. Where are the friends and loved ones of all these other people?

So let’s assume that a substantial majority of the currently obese do not go to the Atkins approach or Weight Watchers or Jenny Craig but continue as they are into late middle age and beyond. The medical problems, one would think, will simply explode exponentially. Anything from bad backs and bad feet to hypertension to organ failures to heart attacks and strokes; heck, I’m not that familiar with disease but I’m probably understating the range of possibilities here.

And all of these problems will cost money to treat. Blood pressure medication isn’t that expensive but all the doctor office visits, X-Rays and CAT scans, operations, hospital stays surely will add up; I bet there’s a study out there somewhere but I’m just not up to the Googling on a Sunday morning to find it. Where is all this money going to come from? If people, especially corporate benefit managers and their bosses, think that insurance rates are going up fast now, wait ten years when this trend starts hitting the books and I wonder if the current system will be brought to its knees.

Up until now, smoking has probably been the ‘voluntary’ activity that caused/causes the most treatment expense but its impact on the system is probably waning as fewer and fewer people light up each year. We allowed insurance plans to cover smokers’ illnesses but in recent years governments and individuals have been winning lawsuits against the tobacco companies to recover the cost, so much so that (one of?) the biggest, Atria/Phillip Morris, now claims that it may go bankrupt due to an adverse result in Illinois.

But health problems due to improper eating are much more easily cured, at much lower cost, if only the patient is willing. A few people, proportionally, do have underlying genetic and glandular disorders that are not simple to correct but otherwise every fat person can become a healthy size without question. They need only make the choice to begin eating in a healthy way. Note that I’m not calling for a mass conversion to a controlled carbohydrate diet or any other specific plan: some will do best with Atkins, others with Slim-Fast, and others just by reducing portion sizes.

Restaurants and food manufacturers can help out though such changes may not be in their best interest. That’s a whole other can of worms and one I’m not prepared to go into in this essay, that conflict of interest, but suffice to say it won’t be an easy obstacle to overcome. After all, how many kids start down the path to Fattyhood because they eat a bowl or two of nearly pure sugar and starch every morning and are helped along by cartoon hero-pushed snacks every afternoon?

Many leaders in our society run under a banner labelled Family Values to strengthen the rationale for their cause. This issue would certainly seem to me to be a true family issue. Parents need to provide proper nutrition to their children and teach them healthy eating habits regardless of the pressure kids put on to have the latest cool but nutionally valueless foods. One may agree or disagree on the propriety of, say, same sex marriage, school prayer, and the like but I find myself having great difficulty believing that anyone would disagree that a primary parental responsibility is to imbue a child with healthy habits.

So I come back to my initial question: who will pay for this? In the end, Social Security may or may not have enough money to pay Boomers what we’re owed in retirement, Nabisco and General Mills, McDonalds and Burger King, Coca-Cola and Pepsi may go broke defending lawsuits and paying of damage awards, but will our system be able to handle the huge financial burden of the obesity epidemic? Or is it up to all of us to come to each others’ aid now to cure this ailment before that happens and the tsunamai’s wave bursts past our shorelines?

I think it is not too late. If a true couch potato like me can lose over half my unhealthy excess in a year with a simple change in eating and a modest increase in exercise, I believe most of my fellow fatties can as well. Emotional support is a truly important element of success, a simple thing for thoughtful friends, co-workers, and family members to give each other. We’ll have to fight the food companies with their huge advertising budgets and teach the restaurants to serve smaller portions again, and fight the temptation to reward every small loss with a Krispy Kreme or small pizza.

What choice do we have, though? If we hope to have a healthy, prosperous America in 30 or 40 years, we cannot be on our knees paying for the cost of treating the overweight. No, we must make war on this problem, a campaign more successful than anti-smoking or the War on Drugs. Even if the result of failure is far less obvious, the true cost is far higher. If you’re already a healthy sized person, look around you to see who needs your support. If you are fat, look inside yourself and find the strength to begin the battle.

Yesterday’s movie: Freaky Friday

A movie that could easily have gone over the edge in sentimentality, obviousness or obnoxiousness didn’t. As a result, the audience with which we saw Freaky Friday applauded when the final credits ran. I didn’t go that far but I did laugh through most of the movie, except for some touching scenes towards the end when I cried. Seriously, this Disney-made flick is just terrific and worth seeing even at the outrageous prices charged here in Silicon Valley.

This remake is the exception, I suppose that proves the rule. You know, the rule which says that remakes are crap. Seriously, how many good remakes can you point to? Warren Beatty’s Heaven Can Wait was great but Chris Rock’s re-remake (Down to Earth) was just sad. As great an actor as Robert Deniro is, was his Cape Fear better than Gregory Peck’s? Unlike theatrical productions, movies are best left in their original state. Still, try an idea often enough and there are bound to be some successes, as is the case here.

Jamie Lee Curtis and Lindsay Lohan play the mother and daughter who are the focus of the film (Barbara Harris and a very young Jodie Foster in the original). Curtis has no need to prove her acting skills, anyone who saw her in Trading Places and True Lies will agree, but Lohan was a surprise (some fans might take issue with me for saying that!), a very nice surprise, who makes a terrific mark in her first feature starring role. You will recall that mother and daughter switch bodies, meaning, of course, that Lohan spends a considerable portion of her screen time playing the mother trapped in a 15 year old body. I’m not surprised to read that Disney already has her in production on a movie for next year (Confessions of a Teenage Drama Queen).

Harold Gould makes a rare appearance, providing quality as my footie friends would say, as the nutty grandfather, Mark Harmon has a quiet time as Curtis’s fiance, Rosalind Chao looks ageless as the Chinese restauranteur whose mother causes the switch, and Chad Michael Murray is sensitive and hunky as the guy Lohan must have.

The soundtrack is pretty good too. Lohan’s character plays in a band, which is featured on a couple of tracks, but really good are The Donna’s Backstage, Joey Ramone’s cover of What a Wonderful World and a hard rocking take on Britney Spear’s …Baby One More Time by Bowling For Soup; they could have left off the hurried, emotionless remake of Happy Together from Simple Plan.

Definitely recommended

Entertaining entertainments

  • Will The Wire be back next year? Yes, the exceedingly dense show was renewed by HBO for a third season, filming to begin with the turn of the year, no precise air dates yet set.
  • Will Sledge Hammer return?
  • Can sexually transmitted diseases be the basis of a fun game? STD-ster thinks so.
  • Can Kevin Costner make (that is, star in and direct) another good Western? The NY Times says sorry but no.
  • Why did McGarrett wear a coat and tie to romance a hot hippy chick on the beach? No one know the answer to that!
  • Is Freaky Friday a fun movie? Sure is! Review coming up soon

C#: Making progress

Posting has been a little light here this week, so like many another blogger I will make my excuses to you all. I’m pretty sick of politics and am trying to avoid posting rant after rant, because I am trying to avoid working up to the fever pitch of said rants. Not good for my mental health, which has enough other challenges, if you know what I mean. On the plus side, though, I am making real progress learning C# and have actually written a couple of little apps that are completely useless except as learning exercises. Also, lunch was had with a dear friend so I could get all the info on her recent romantic weekend and later coffee with a buddy who is extremely well connected in the local work world and always has an idea or three for me. Tomorrow being Thursday, I will try and post another installment of the comic strip; having to work within the limits of the tool, I think that’s going fine but I should try and do something a bit more substantive with it or quit.

New Clancy novel

In his last few novels, bestselling author Tom Clancy has suffered from what many called verbal diarrhea. He also seemed to have run out of steam with Jack Ryan, going back to tell a tale from the early days in his last book. With The Teeth of the Tiger, just out, Clancy looks to have reinvented his career: the novel is less than 500 pages and, though it works within the established milieu, focuses on a new cast of characters.

Google: creeping all the way to everything

  • News – pulled in from thousands of sources all over the globe and, except in very unusual circumstances, no human intervention to determine importance.
  • Calculator – for the mathphobic and the geekheads, calculations from the simple to the sublime.
  • Stock Quotes – go to the main page, type in a ticker symbol (say, MSFT), and click the I’m Feeling Lucky button and you go straight to the Yahoo! Finance Page for that stock.
  • Dictionary and Spell Checker
  • Phone Book – type in your phone number and see what comes back!
  • Street Maps – where do you want to go today?
  • Even machine translation of web pages and plain text.
  • Finally, of course, Google also owns Blogger, used to publish this message for you.

[Note: New version of Blogger, same old crappy handling of lists in posts.]

Board meeting night

Board meetings are only every other month because I don’t think anyone would agree to serve if they were more often. Tonight, for instance, we got the pleasure of starting off with four complaints from a single homeowner. Any one of his issues wouldn’t have been to bad but the sum was just a bit too much. Then came the 800 pound gorilla, discussion and approval of the annual budget: a $50 monthly increase in the unit dues.

Doesn’t that just suck? There is no real alternative, though, as we’re going to have a major repaving next month and roof replacement program beginning next year. Previous boards (for what reason I’m not sure, probably inadequate reserve studies) just didn’t put enough money away in the kitty for this stuff and we’ll have to make it up now. Uggh!

Thankfully when I walked in the door just before 8:00 TS1 had a delicious dinner of BBQ boneless country pork ribs and spinach ready for me. And a public TV station was showing a classic 1980 Beach Boys concert from Knebworth (that’s in England), one of the last shows with all six of the original Boys together on stage. Talk about your California chill pills!

Two Movies: A Hard Day’s Night, Don’t Look Back

Since this little essay seems to be the 200th movie review (to use the term loosely) published here on BillSaysThis, I thought I’d pair these two films about the mid-60s concert scene by what are arguably the two most important popular music acts of the era, The Beatles and Bob Dylan. I watched the former a few weeks back (thanks Pam for the present!) and the latter am still enjoying some of the DVD extras as I write this but was struck by the similarities and differences.

First off, both are Definitely Recommended as long as you think you’ll enjoy the music and not worth watching otherwise. Fortunately for me, I do very much. Second, don’t expect anything close to a normal movie in either instance: one was thrown together just to capitalize on the band’s popularity without time to plan or think things through and the other is an avant-garde documentary that makes no attempt to provide context or comfortable familiarity.

In A Hard Day’s Night, the Beatles take an overnight train trip to London for a performance, joined by their road manager and Paul McCartney’s grandfather (actually a wiley old actor named Wilfred Brambell). Director Richard Lester in many scenes simply worked from a setup and suggested bit of action; even though Alun Owen wrote what many said was an excellent script, very little of his dialogue and staging was used.

The DVD has lots of extras and one that was particularly interesting to me was a series of interviews with people involved in organizing and making the movie (though none of the Beatles themselves participated). We find that the studio executives in America who provided the financing were mainly interested in getting a soundtrack record and its publishing rights; the go ahead was given before the group had made much of an impact in the States though their instant godhood via that first Ed Sullivan show performance came before filming began. Little did they realize…

From our perspective in 2003, Hard Day’s Night may seem amateurish and even a poor outing by the Fab Four (except, of course, for the actual music) given our familiarity with more modern efforts, especially the million dollar major label videos seen over the last decade or more but remember that in 1964 there was no such thing. Rock and roll in the movies was pretty much Elvis in whatever dreck Colonel Parker put in front of him and Frankie and Annette beach movies and music television was American Bandstand plus the occasional crumb of an appearance on Sullivan, who was more interested in his Broadway pals and circus acts. In fact, Lester lampoons the latter by having a dance troup and ‘plate spinner’ appear with the Beatles on a TV broadcast.

Mainly, the film has the boys (in their early 20s at the time) have fun with a bunch of situations: on board the train, getting from the station to the hotel, in the hotel room with each other and with room service, finding Grandpa when gets loose, backstage at the show, and even at a police station where they go to retrieve the old man. Absurdity, nonsense, and the occasional tip of the cap to Spike Jones and old school Peter Sellers.

Did I say mainly? Okay, that’s true in terms of minutes but the primary source of entertainment is the music, perhaps the peak of their early period, with Lennon and McCartney confident in their own writing abilities but still working within the existing forms. The title song, amusingly enough, wasn’t even written until after the filming when everyone was trying to figure out a name for the movie; when one was arrived at, Lennon came back the next morning with the complete song.

On the train, in fact, we’re also introduced to Patti Boyd as one of two girls that Paul tries to talk up but who end up flirting with Grandpa instead. Boyd took up with and then married George, later becoming the object of Eric Clapton’s unrequited affections when he wrote Layla for and about her, though she eventually gave in and left Harrison for him. Clapton, in his happiness, then wrote Wonderful Tonight for her.

Don’t Look Back is much more difficult to pin down; documentary maker DA Pennebaker completely ignores convention and simply edits together bits of film that he expects will, in sum, present a meaningful portrait of Bob Dylan. Shot in 1965, almost exactly a year after the Beatles’ movie, and also in black and white, Dylan is captured before he retreated into his shell, before he decided to essentially stop saying anything in public other than his lyrics (or even less connected to reality).

There is absolutely no inclusion of, say, captions to let the viewer know where some scene is taking place, except for the odd mention by a hotel staff or glimpse of signage such as on the approach to Royal Albert Hall. Pennebaker seems to have laid down on the back floor of limousines and simply wandered where he would with a small camera to get his shots, giving the film a radical perspective, an awesome feeling of simply being inside the space. Where Hard Day’s Night laid the foundation for two generations of rock films, Don’t Look Back had a more immediate impact as the rock festival films like Woodstock and Monterey Pop came out and took the Pennebaker style as their own.

I think that there must be hundreds or thousands of feet of unused footage filmed early on, before Dylan and his pals–mainly Joan Baez, Bob Neuwirth, Albert Grossman, and Marianne Faithfull–got used to the camera’s intrusiveness. Still, on screen Dylan is comfortable and has, for example, an outstanding exchange with a small-time British reporter sent to interview him. The singer turns the tables on the out of his depth young man, questioning him on life and his worth rather than simply responding to standard questions posed a thousand times before; one really gets a glimpse of his intelligence and twistedness.

Donovan (Leitch), just making a name for himself in England at the time of filming, comes up in conversation early in the film and then later on shows up in a hotel room where he and Dylan trade performances. Baez sings a few times as well, and Alan Price, who’d just left The Animals after playing keyboards on their hit House of the Rising Sun.

During the film itself, most of the stage performances are cut short, just excerpts, but the DVD has recordings of all five songs in the extra material; my favorite of them is It’s all Over Now, Baby Blue. Also added is an alternate version of the Subterranean Homesick Blues video which opens the movie–the one where Dylan stands there nonplussed and drops cards with a word or two from each line to the ground.

Atkins update: W00T!

11 months, eight days into the diet: 51.5 pounds and 10 waistline inches lost. TS1 is doing quite well, looking very svelte and sexy, as well. This weight is actually one of my major milestones as it is less, by half a pound, than my low weight on my previous Atkins episode in 2000. I hope Doc and the other bloggers doing Atkins and other weight loss approaches are succeeding too.