Waiting, waiting

“Patience is a virtue” is one cliche’s advice I’ve never really mastered. For example, in the Hebrew alphabet, the letters each have a numerical value: aleph is one, gimmel is two, and chai (the letter has no English equivalent but is the first one in the word Hanukah) is eighteen. As in English, sometimes the same sound/word in Hebrew has more than one meaning. Chai also means life. Hence the song “To life, to life, l’chaim.” So 18 and multiples of it have special meaning; monetary gifts are often given in multiples of it in dollars or sheckels.

Today is double chai, or 36 days, until I marry Vivian. And I truly can’t wait. As Scoble wrote so eloquently last year in the weeks leading up to the wedding to his own Sweet One, Vivian is just the most wonderful woman in the world. She is kind, considerate, funny, friendly, sexy, charming, caring, and a good cook. Love, it’s a good thing. More of you should have it your own life, I only wish it for you.

So screw patience and let’s all do whatever’s necessary to get May 10 here as soon as possible, okay?

Yesterday’s book: Earth

You see the book on the store shelf and think, Damn, that’s an ambitious title! But then you go ahead and say, David Brin, make me believe. And Brin does, in Earth he’s created a masterpiece of modern science fiction. Perhaps even a masterpiece of modern fiction, in the same way The Old Man and the Sea isn’t just a fishing story and The Treasure of Sierra Madre is more than a Western.

Published in 1990, Earth was runnerup for the Hugo award for best novel and that seems reasonable. Brin uses the novel as way to correlate all the ecological concerns into a holistic nightmare; several times he repeats the statement that Humanity keeps postponing the Big Dieback by one last minute invention or intervention or another but that can only last so long. Desertification, pollution, overpopulation, overstimulation, good intentions gone bad are all worked into a coherent collision in the year 2038 with one final invention too many: the ability of Alex Lustig, a brilliant scientist, to devise a machine (which Brin names a cavitron) that can manufacture a tiny black hole.

When Lustig’s first effort comes online to power an energy generation facility, a riot causes a malfunction which ruptures the containment vessel and the singularity sinks into the Earth; this bit takes place before the book starts and we learn about it during conversation, more or less. Lustig has found a wealthy new backer to finance his search for the missing depth charge, which they hope to find and capture before it’s gravitational force devours our planet. In their work, the team builds new technology they intend to use as a radar/sonar analog but which manipulates gravity as a side effect. And the scientists find another black hole tracing orbits deep inside Earth, larger, older, and more sophisticated than anything humans could have made.

So their quest becomes a race to tame Beta, as they call this monstrosity, but lingering national governments working on their own cause troubles. All of which are multiplied because in 2038 everything, even deeply secret government systems, are connected in the equivalent of the (not yet invented at the time of the novel’s writing) Worldwide Web.

One woman, Daisy, is both an ultimate master of software which can infiltrate and defeat any security measures and an ardent ‘priestess’ of Gaia; when she gets an inkling of what’s happening, she bends all her effort and tools to gaining control of these powerful instruments. Will she win and in so doing erase all but a handful of people from the planet? Another woman, Jen Wolling, is Alex’s grandmother as well as the person who created the modern ecological science that Daisy worships and Wolling is not one to sit back, even in her 90s, and allow a misguided disciple to go so far awry.

Brin has thrown everything into this book. As I’ve indicated he has a powerful plot and quite a few good characters. He also employs non-linear techniques like short entries from reference and news sources (a la Asimov’s Encyclopedia Galactica) and brief italicized passages explanation the planetary evolution of Earth (the opening sentence of the novel is “First came a supernova, dazzling the Universe in brief, spendthrift glory before ebbing into twisty, multispectral clouds of new formed atoms.”).

He even provides an Afterward, to ensure that no reader misses the warning he intends with his story. We must understand that our planet is a precious resource that is to be tended and nurtured so that its bounty can endure for millenia to come and not be wasted in a brief greedy burst of consumption.

Highly recommended

Back, yes I am

Had a very good two days up in Seattle, thanks for asking. Not nearly as much rain as one would expect based on all the chatter and such. A very nice city, in fact. Sorry for the mystery but I’ll say more when appropriate.

For all the fuss made about how San Francisco International Airport has weather-related problems due to fog and such, a survey published yesterday by the Department of Transportation’s Air Travel Consumer Report ranks it tops in the US for on time departures and fifth for arrivals. Philadelphia and Boston come out on the bottom of all hub airports.

Quick trip

I’ll be off the air, most likely, for the next couple of days. I have to make a quick trip to Seattle for [mysteriously deleted] and don’t expect to have web access. Afterwards I hope to have a good tale to tell.

Libel and neutral reporting

These days, one has trouble opening a newspaper or cable news channel without having to adjust for bias in one political direction or the other. So I found it strange to read Suit Challenges Right to Report Political Slurs and keep a straight face. Plus, I was once, for a very short time, a 20-something local paper reporter covering similar municipal meetings.

The linked article concerns a libel case that has reached the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, and only eight years after the initiating event too. One night in 1995, at a meeting of a dinky little town council, one councilman stood up and “called the council president and the mayor ‘liars,’ ‘criminals,’ ‘draft dodgers’ and ‘child molesters’.” Silly local politics, with no truth to the accusations, but the cub reporter was there and used the outburst as the lead in the next day’s article.

The indiscreet councilman has already lost the libel suit filed against him, and lost the next election too when his voters realized his, er, suitability for office. But based on the instructions given by the judge, the same jury found that the newspaper was not guilty of anything because the article accurately detailed the event and did not add any judgement. The slurred politicians were not satisfied, of course, and appealed, getting the appellate court to overturn the verdict based on the ‘incorrect’ instruction given by the judge.

So the question up to the PA Supremes is whether a newspaper has the responsibility and is required to ascertain the truth of potentially libelous statements before printing them, rather than simply being required to accurately quote public figures. I find this kind of sad, that in 2003 reporters and newspapers still have to defend themselves from stupid politicians; in my view, the people have an absolute right in America to know all the details of their government, at all levels, and this was an event that took place at a public meeting! Heck, in some states I think the concept of the shield law is still not firmly established. Independent or not, judges are still a part of the political machinery and so I shouldn’t be surprised by this. Saddened, though. Let’s just hope that the correct decision is handed down.

[via garret]

Today’s movie: Rikky and Pete

An Australian film from 1988, Rikky and Pete is a so-so tale of two grown siblings who flee their domineering father and an angry, semi-psychotic copper in Brisbane for the mining works far north in the Outback. The plot’s just whacked together, with bits and characters coming in and out without too much reasoning involved, and the sister (Nina Landis) keeps getting up onstage to sing. Overall it has a certain charm but that may just be my general enchantment with all things Aussie.

Watchable if nothing else is on the tube

Another year, another season of Giants baseball annoying me by pre-empting the regular programming on KTVU. Fcukers! Network affiliates should not be allowed to do this.

Frustrations of an HOA President

As I mentioned back in August, I’m the president of the homeowners association in which I live. For the most part this is not a particularly difficult, onerous, or distasteful position. We meet only once every other month and have a few issues to deal with by phone or email in between. And being president generally only means being the main point of contact for outsiders; I don’t (ha-ha) have veto power over the other board members.

One resident, who I obviously am not going to name, is the exception to this generally amiable situation. Call the person Mr. X, though I’m not saying this is a man. Mr. X has lived in his unit for many years, certainly far longer than my five and a half. Apparently at one time there was a pretty good relation with the other residents but then something happened between X and certain HOA board members (none of whom are on the board today), details of which have never been related to me. Ever since then, X has waged a virtual war to essentially get the board to acknowledge his bad treatment.

One of the other board members suggested today that she might try and have a conversation with Mr. X to try and resolve his latest set of complaints. And to get X to pay up, as he’s not paid the monthly association assessment for over six months. She asked me “Is [X] a bit nuts–I mean seriously?”

I said “He’s not dangerous, by any means, but insane depends on your definition of the term. Some would say repeating the same action time after time when there is no positive response would be one definition. Mr. X will talk your ear off though, and never accept that you won’t agree with every single point he raises. Then afterwards he’ll behave as if the conversation never took place.

“I would point out to you that in the last year he’s sent us several lawyer letters and had at least two different mediation services contact us but never followed through with a single one after we responded. And each of these incidents cost the association money because we need to have [our lawyer] respond!

“I think that possibly X is just using the HOA as a release point for the frustrations in his life. So no matter what we do his behavior will continue unchanged. What will change it is that if he doesn’t pay off the back dues and fees soon, we will file and get a lien on his home and at that point the HOA can force a sale. Unless he buys it himself, he will have to leave at that point.”

A good example of the extreme, if not ridiculous, extent to which X takes his complaints is found in the lawyer letter I received today. The is demanding that we investigate who is throwing rotten potatoes and an old sock from the common area over the fence into his patio area. There is no way that investigating such an event is the responsibility of the board! Puh-leeze! Yet we will have to take time and effort, which costs the other 27 unit owners, to respond. As the saying goes, there’s always one bad apple.

Site update: New PHP movie page code

I realize that this amazing news will not thrill all that many people but if Adam can blather about his Python play and hey, it makes me happy…

I wrote some brand new PHP code for idsplaying the movie page for 2004+. Up until now, and still for the 2003 movie page, I kept all the film information in a text file. For a while I wanted to upgrade this to storing the info in a database and a more flexible object-oriented codebase. So since Sunday I’ve been working it out and now the project is at a state where the 2004 page shows the same as the old version. Still have a few more features to add for new display possibilities but it’s cool for now.

Tonight’s TV Alert: Tom Friedman on Discovery Channel

Tonight at 10, the Discovery Channel will broadcast a special written and hosted by NY Times columnist Thomas Friedman called Searching for the Roots of 9/11. Description is “Featuring the three-time Pulitzer Prize-winning New York Times columnist, Tom Friedman, viewers get a broad portrait of the roots of Muslim rage and the mistrust towards America. Friedman provides reports from Indonesia, Qatar, Egypt, Europe and beyond.”

Friedman is an excellent, insightful writer (for example, today’s column Scorecard for the War) and I will guess that he will put the hour on screen tonight to very good use. Try and catch it, live or Tivo’d.

Today’s movie: Bananas

Woody Allen made Bananas back in 1971 but the biting social commentary in it is as relevant today as then. Specifically I’m referring to the political humor and the way he puts his Fielding Melish character on trial for treason, with Miss America testifying that disagreeing with the President is wrong.

I’m a big Woody Allen fan, so take my opinion with a grain of salt if you’re not, but I think this is just a terrific movie. Look at it from one angle and you see a constant barrage of jokes as he barely let seconds go by without either visual, physical, or oral humor. The movie opens with Don Dunphy and Howard Cosell, popular at the time as boxing commentators for ABC’s Wide World of Sports, parodying themselves by doing the setup and play-by-play on the assasination of a banana republic dictator, and ending with the same two going ringside at the consummation of Melish’s wedding to Nancy (Louise Lasser), including post-coital interviews.

From the other side, Bananas is a movie with a really funny plot, that hangs together from start to finish with no obvious gaps in logic or motivation. One can see his thematic and visual styles begin to emerge in what is, after all, only the second film he made. He had a co-writer, Mickey Rose, and I’d be interested in knowing who put what into the shooting script, but overall the movie cannot be mistaken as anyone else’s work.

One interesting aspect is that this is the last time that an Allen film does not have at its core a relationship between him and a woman. His character, Melish, is essentially no different than all the others he’s written over the years, just younger, awkward, shy, hypersexual, goofy, bumbling but, in the end, the winner. Though there is Lasser’s character and the film does end with them together, it just isn’t about them as a couple. Compare this to, say, Annie Hall or Manhattan and you’ll understand what I mean.

Recommended for laughter

Vaxgen: Lawsuit City

I haven’t made any comments in the month since Vaxgen released the results of their AIDSVAX study. To some degree, the silence came out of sadness, for the people’s lives this vaccine would have changed and for my own financial results. I sold out my shares at $5.10, waiting for a short cover bounce that never came, but fortunately above the $2.70 low.

Predictably, the lawyers are out in force and looking for any blood they can suck. If you check the Yahoo! Finance news page for VXGN, the last eight listings are all about announcing lawsuits against the company. Not to worry, all the big names are included. Inevitably they’ll get consolidated into one action but I suppose the firms are just jockeying now to ensure as much of the fees as can be had.

I haven’t really decided yet, or looked into it, but I may yet find it necessary, if distasteful, to sign on to one of these suits. One question that all the plaintiffs need to consider is how much pie there is to be had in the event of a victory. According to company statements, Vaxgen had about $18 million cash (and equivalents) on hand on 12/31/02–but they’ve been burning around $8-10 million per quarter and even with the end of the initial vaccine trials and new revenue from Smallpox and Anthrax work, I doubt they’ll turn profitable anytime soon. Wonder what other deep pockets the lawyers hope to tap.