Category Archives: romance

Thirteen Conversations About One Thing

Watched parts of both Chasing Papi and Thirteen Conversations About One Thing today but couldn’t get my head into either; surprisingly both were efforts from women directors. The first was mainly about showing off the feminine assets of Roselyn Sanchez, Sofia Vergara (my favorite) and Jaci Velasquez. The latter was some kind of babble featuring Matthew McConaughey, John Turturro, Amy Irving, Alan Arkin and a boatload of others in a film that was all about talking and never about doing, as far as I could tell; I turned it off to watch this week’s season premiere of Reno 911.

Also posted in movies, Not Recommended, Reviews | Comments Off

The Guru

There are, it is said, only seven basic plots in all the world, and Shakespeare wrote the best possible versions of each of them 400 years ago. Still, movie theaters and TV channels have space to fill and so studios keep turning out product. The most basic plot of all is boy meets girl, boy loses girl, boy gets girl and they live happily ever after. The Guru tries to bring a few twists to this old as the hills story and succeeds.

Jimi Mistry is Ramu, an Indian kid who grows up idolizing and idealizing movie musicals and actors, but is little more than a dance teacher who captivates his Macarena students. Shades of Cinema Paradiso but instead of becoming a projectionist, Ramu moves to New York to seek stardom. Mistaking an audition for a porn movie for a real one, he meets Sharonna (Heather Graham), his intended co-star. But, given the opportunity, he can’t perform in front of the crowd of set techs.

Through a series of accidents and mistaken identity Ramu picks up with rich, directionless Lexi (Marisa Tomei) as a guru of sex and Lexi, using her friendships and connections, builds him into a new flash on the New York scene. Meanwhile, Sharonna, engaged to a very strict Catholic firefighter, is giving Ramu lessons so (she thinks) he can make it in the porn world. In reality, he’s using these lessons as the source material for his guru sessions. And then everything collides, but I don’t want to give away the amusements of the last act.

This is a truly funny, witty movie. One of the aspects of much humor in recent years that bothers me is the meanness, the humor that comes at the expense of another. But The Guru is able to avoid this, though admittedly there are a few stereotypes (like Tomei’s rich bitch mother, played by Christine Baranski). The script is by Tracey Jackson (her first produced script) and the film is directed by Daisy von Scherler Mayer (the Parker Posey indie Party Girl and Jada Pinkett’s Woo) and these women combine to bring a terrific touch and sensitivity to their work.

Recommended

Also posted in comedy, family, movies, Recommended, Reviews | Comments Off

Something's Gotta Give

This Jack Nicholson/Diane Keaton movie was good, really good; I’d say it even had a chance to be on some all-time top romantic comedy lists but missed by just a bit. Nicholson plays his public personna: the wealthy ultimate womanizing bachelor still dating under 30 beauties at 63, with the concept of commitment and relationship utterly foreign to him. Keaton plays a mid-50s-ish divorcee, a leading playwright who’s given up on finding someone to shop at her store (to paraphrase one of her lines).

Nancy Meyers has a history with romantic comedies–Father of the Bride, Baby Boom, What Women Want–so Something’s Gotta Give doesn’t come out of the blue but she’s certainly taken her game to another level since divorcing former writing/producing partner Charles Shyer prior to Women. While I’ve no reason to believe that this is autobiographical, one can easily draw a line from her circumstances, throw in demonstrable creativity and get a character in Keaton’s Erica that Meyers understands. And being a longtime Hollywood professional, she’s surely met many men like Nicholson’s Harry Sanborn!

As I said, this is almost an all-timer, which certainly makes me happy to have spent $15 for two tickets. The plotting is believable and the way we get to the (admittedly inevitable) ending has unpredictable twists, the characters feel real and developed, the dialog is funny and crisp. The main supporting roles are done well too: Keanu Reeves in his first post-Matrix role as Nicholson’s doctor and a much younger man who falls for Keaton, Amanda Peet as Keaton’s daughter and Nicholson’s original romantic interest, and Frances McDormand plays the encouraging, snarky, intelligent sister who pushes Keaton to remember that life is for the living.

So what quibbles did I find that make me say Something’s Gotta Give is almost but not quite great? There are three main reasons. First, towards the end after what is the first false ending (when Harry comes to the rehearsal of Erica’s new play), Meyers simply skips the action ahead six months and this feels artificial and out of step with the rest of the movie. Second, Peet’s character is the only one that doesn’t feel real and in the second half seems written simply to support the plot rather than organically do the job. Last, I wonder why there isn’t a single less than beautiful person in the entire movie–the closest is a somewhat chunky Jon Favreau in a cameo as Nicholson’s chief assistant–and I see this a true flaw in a movie which argues, at its core, that model-style beauty isn’t necessary for love. Even so, where a classic would rank above 95 on a scale of 100, I’d rate Something at 90±2.

Surely recommended

Also posted in comedy, movies, Recommended, Reviews, romantic comedy | Comments Off

Y tu mama tambien

From 2001, Y tu mama tambien is a critically acclaimed movie made in Mexico by Alfonso Cuaron (who is directing the next Harry Potter film) about two teenage boys and a slightly older woman who learn about life, love and themselves in the course of a trip to an isolated beach. Very tittilating movie mining wellworn territory.

Frankly I don’t understand why this film was so well received (such as an Oscar nomination for Best Writing that Cuaron shared with his brother) but perhaps it was the pseudo-innocent sexuality swirled with mixed-high left wing politics. The film opens with one of the boys and his girlfriend, naked and tossing together in bed, followed by the other boy sneaking in some last-minute sex with his own chickie before the two girls fly off for a Summer holiday in Italy. And the Cuaron brothers throw in more physicality about any chance they get. Meanwhile, there is talk of political corruption, protests and economic disparity combined with classism around every bend.

Not recommended

Also posted in drama, movies, Not Recommended, Reviews | Comments Off

The Rules of Attraction

Bret Easton Ellis writes novels that focus on the charismatic sociopath searching for an emotional connection. His first book, Less Than Zero, was a blast when I read it, like a much more real version of the movie crap Hollywood was putting out in the mid-’80s. But his stories work much better on the page than on the screen and The Rules of Attraction is no exception.

Roger Avary (Killing Zoe) writes and directs, trying to make something artful and eclectic out of something that doesn’t really have a plot; in fact, he’s going to have an even more difficult time with Ellis’ recent novel Glamorama, which he’s making now. Avary tries to use non-traditional techniques like running film backwards to connect the three main characters to each other, as well as quite a bit of voiceover, and wrapping the film in a flashback without letting the audience know what they’ve seen is the denoument. So I watched the whole film thinking that the first few minutes were actually the story’s beginning.

James Van Der Beek plays the semi-lead character, Sean, who tells us at the beginning that he’s an emotional vampire. Shannyn Sossamon is a fellow student, Lauren, who’s caught Sean’s eye but is only interested in the missing Victor. Ian Somerhalder plays a student named Paul just coming into his own homosexuality who also wants Sean in his bed. Sean thinks Lauren has been sending him unsigned love letters–though she hasn’t, the letters come from another–and Sean somehow sees her as an innocent, uncorrupted spirit, something he’s apparently never been. The truth, as with the letters, is quite different as we see Lauren submit to drunken sex, smoke pot and go down on a TA to help her grade and snort coke with her roommate.

In fact, in place of a plot Avary mainly shows us scenes of drug and alcohol consumption, foreplay and sex (though nothing more explicit than bare breasts get onscreen) and a bit of rudeness and violence. The result is a pretty but empty mishmash.

Sadly, not recommended

Also posted in drama, movies, Not Recommended, Reviews | Comments Off

Love Actually

Richard Curtis gives us one of the sweetest movies of recent memory with his meditation on the many aspects of love in Love Actually. This is not a slick, made for Hollywood movie and if you were expecting a love story with Hugh Grant’s Prime Minister falling for Martine McCutcheon’s Natalie, as some of the advertising might lead one to believe, you would be wrong though hopefully not disappointed.

Curtis, who made his directorial debut with this effort, is a veteran screenwriter who has long effective in combining romance and comedy (Bridget Jones’s Diary, Notting Hill, Four Weddings and a Funeral for romantic comedies, most of Rowan Atkinson’s oevre for pure comedy) and I think he’s really put it all together for Love Actually. The film is a melange of vignettes on different types of love, elegantly stitched together, and elevated to a lofty whole by an excellent cast. Grant is definitely a personal favorite, as is Emma Thompson playing his (younger?) sister–her Much Ado About Nothing is in my all-time Top 10–married to philandering Alan Rickman.

Love can be wonderful, sweet, endearing, unanticipated but also hard, painful, demanding, disappointing and unrequited, and Curtis covers them all. This is on my Top 5 for the year and I don’t expect that to change.

Definitely recommended

Also posted in comedy, favorites, movies, Recommended, Reviews, romantic comedy | Comments Off

Kissing Jessica Stein

Self-esteem is a terrible curse on the human ego; it can force us to make incredibly poor choices, even when it takes the form of perfectionism. Jessica Stein, our heroine, suffers from that affliction and developed it early in life–her mother reminds her of the time in fifth grade when she dropped out of the lead role in a play simply because the boy playing opposite her wasn’t good enough. We see so many examples of that including one scene at a dinner party when her boss Josh (played so well by Scott Cohen) throws it right in her face by calling her after she complains that the only dates she gets are with “freaks and morons.” Couldn’t it be, he asks, that the problem is with her and not the men?

Kissing Jessica Stein (2001) is an entertaining look at single life in New York City at a time when the phrase “lipstick lesbian” was on, well, everyone’s lips. And so Ms. Stein, a cute bundle of energy played by Jennifer Westfeldt, takes a stab at the same sex, answering a personal ad from Helen (Heather Juergensen). At first repelled by her own inclination, she relaxes just enough to talk with Helen, then to kiss, then after weeks of kissing, to move on.

But while Jessica’s happier by the day with her romantic life, she still can’t bring herself to let anyone else in on the secret, always introducing Helen as her friend and making excuses for their being together. Until an unmentioned wedding brings the water to boil and the two break up. This is a romantic comedy, though it drips with political overtones, so the couple comes out of the closet and makes up–they even move in together. But there’s a reason for the term lipstick lesbian, which truly does capture the Jessica character so well, and she really wants no more than a best friend. Helen, turns out, truly is lesbian and she soon finds a better match.

In some ways this movie, which was written by Westfeldt and Juergensen, is obviously the work of inexperienced writers (it is the only produced screenplay by either), with desired plot points simply occuring more or less as needed without proper development. The direction by Charles Herman-Wurmfeld was also a bit simplistic, and also not surprising as it was his first feature film, though it did lead to better things as he was picked to direct Reese Witherspoon in the just released Legally Bonde 2. Reminds me of Damon and Affleck writing Good Will Hunting as way to get good parts for themselves.

Soctt Cohen does a really good job as the main heterosexual male. Such as the look on his face when he finds out the truth about the two women, immediately after telling Jessica how he (in so many words) loves her! I knew he looked familiar and, sure enough, a bit of peeking uncovered that he played the despicable cop Harry Denby on NYPD Blue a few years ago.

Could be that Westfeldt and Juergensen are busy doing, say, stage work but I’m quite surprised after seeing Kissing Jessica Stein that neither has done another piece of significant movie work since. Westfeldt has a role in a movie that screams “direct to cable” coming out later this year in which she shares the screen with top names like Tori Spelling and Malcolm McDowell, with not even that much shown in IMDB for Juergensen. Surprising.

Recommended

Also posted in movies, Recommended, Reviews | Comments Off

Bend It Like Beckham

This one had been on the To See list for weeks now and we were glad to have an opportunity this afternoon to see it. Bend It Like Beckham is an English film about Jesminder, the daughter of a Sikh family who idolizes David Beckham and is actually a decent footballer herself and her fight to gain acceptance of her desires by her parents.

A major subplot is the impending marriage of Jesminder’s sister and this, along with the heavily Indian cast, made me compare Bend to Monsoon Wedding, which I didn’t care for at all. Fortunately, this film is much better and the actors’ accents much more easily understood.

Parminder Nagra plays Jesminder and easily carries the weight of the film, well supported by Keira Knightley as the girl who recruits her to the soccer team and becomes, briefly, a romantic rival. Interestingly, though they both play the equivalent of high school seniors, Nagra was 26 at the time of filming and Knightley only 18. Nagra will next be gracing America with her presence in the TV series ER when the new season opens while Knightley will be all over the multiplexes this week as Orlando Bloom’s love interest in Pirates of the Caribbean.

Since I’d never heard of writer/director Gurinder Chadha before, I chalked up a bunch of poor transitions and editing choices to this being a first effort, but looking him up on IMDB showed this isn’t the case. Oh well. Seems to have done a better job on the script than direction but still adequate, including the climactic action cutting between a soccer match and an extremely energetic dance at the sister’s wedding.

Coming of age tales are quite common in movies and novels but can still be done well, as this film demonstrates. On the other hand, Hollywood turns out dreck like next week’s How to Deal and last year’s Scooby-Doo. Good to know that gems in a class with, say, American Graffitti are still being made.

Highly recommended

Also posted in comedy, family, movies, Recommended, Reviews | Comments Off

The Roman Spring of Mrs. Stone

Trying compete with the production might of HBO has not been easy for the executives at Showtime. Since they seem to have fairly similar subscriber counts (AFAIK, of course), they ought to have similar monies available, but then again HBO is part of AOL Time Warner and Showtime is owned by Viacom, so the difference may be corporate philosophies. Showtime is trying to pick up the pace lately, while also differentiating itself from HBO with more adult-oriented material, so perhaps in a few years they difference will be minimal.

Last night we watched two original films on the #2 cabler, The Roman Spring of Mrs. Stone and Our Town, both filmed versions of classic stage plays. Each is produced quite often on stage and have been filmed numerous times before, of course, so I’m always curious to understand why someone chooses to do so again. The reason for shooting Our Town was quite obvious: any chance to get some proprietary Paul Newman is worth doing. How much could it have cost to just set some cameras up in front of a stage play where the drama was being staged anyway?

The rationale for Roman Spring is not so easy to uncover but I chalk it up to HBO envy–just look at the movie they’re premiering tonight! A movie with an older star set in Italy, just to make the connection explicit. But I’m surely making too much of this, given the long cycles of decision making and production.

Our Town is primordial drama, written by Thornton Wilder and first produced back in 1938, where small events, a few days in the lives of small people in a small town, are used to scrutinize the largest meanings of life. The late ’30s were a time when, as a friend pointed out today, so many intellectuals were attempting to absorb the messages of Nietzsche and Wilder certainly was trying to do so in an American context. In other words, lump this play in with current megahit Matrix Reloaded as fiction attempting to pull the covers off the bed of existance. without all the cool technology and special effects, of course.

Newman plays the Stage Manager, the central role which narrates the play, providing glue material and enough interpretation to ensure that no viewer misses the core message: savor life’s little pleasures before it’s too late. The production, not surprisingly, is filled with name actors: Lorraine Newman, Jeffrey DeMunn, Frank Converse, and Jake Converse; actor James Naughton directed.

Viewing note: Don’t worry if you don’t have Showtime, since this is a Masterpiece Theater co-production and will be seen on that PBS series in August.

Recommended: I watched it because it’s been years since I saw a serious production of the play and, well, Newman is a great actor and I’ll almost always watch anything he’s in.

The Roman Spring of Mrs. Stone was originally written as a novel in 1950 by Tenessee Williams, after Greta Garbo declined his entreaty to use it as a starring vehicle, then later transformed into a play; the original Broadway production starred Vivian Leigh as Stone, an actress who’s passed that certain age, and Warren Beatty as Paolo, the proud but poor Italian count who services rich American widows in post-WWII Rome.

In this version, shot as a film unlike Our Town, Helen Mirren plays the woman past her prime but not past her pride and Olivier Martinez (the hottie who disrupted Diane Lane’s marriage to Richard Gere in last year’s Unfaithful) as the marcetta (Italian for gigolo). Mirren is a good match for the role, as the wrinkles and changes wrought in her face by Time make the contrast with oh so pretty Martinez as well as her own misgivings absolutely explicit. She struggles with the turn in her fortune–her rich, adoring husband dies early on–and is stalked (or so we would call it today) by a character known only as The Young Man throughout. Finally, Stone’s pitiful existence cannot sustain whatever attraction she once had, Martinez moves on to a more tempting target, and Stone surrenders to The Young Man. I didn’t draw the connection, but another reviewer says that The Young Man is William’s symbol of Death; the movie ends semi-ambiguously with Stone embracing him.

Can’t really recommend this as the best use of two hours of lifespan

Also posted in drama, movies, Not Recommended, Reviews | Comments Off

The Thomas Crown Affair (1968)

Steve McQueen or Pierce Brosnan? Faye Dunaway or Rene Russo? Norman Jewison or John McTiernan? Sometimes remakes cannot possibly live up to the original, but are just a combination of star indulgence and commerce, and that’s certainly the case with The Thomas Crown Affair. The 1968 version is stunningly creative while 1999′s is a pallid whitewash.

The key to me is that Jewison, director of the original, wanted to use the romantic caper at the heart of this movie as a framework on which to hang more interesting questions and choices and McTiernan was simply looking for a picture that was softer than his usual straight action fare. Amusingly, the very next film McTiernan made was also a sub-par remake of a Jewison film, Rollerball. But enough of that comparison.

I’d be very interested in seeing the screenplay Alan Trustman turned in and the one Jewison used for shooting because the movie goes for long stretches numerous times without a line of dialog. After an opening scene that establishes McQueen as wealthy, aggressive businessman, Affair moves into the bank robbery and goes a long for perhaps 15-20 minutes with barely a spoken word, just movement, gesture, expression, and a single gunshot. The score, by Michel Legrande, pulses and shouts, allowing Jewison and editor Hal Ashby to use brand new film techniques, split screens and composites, to dazzle us.

Later in the film, after a quiet dinner at his Boston mansion, McQueen and Dunaway play a game of chess. He, of course, expects an easy victory but since this game is a minature of the larger game the two are playing throughout the movie, he doesn’t get it. No dialog until after the game is finished but an intense sequence of facial expressions are exchanged but one can see McQueen buckling under the pressure of Dunaway’s seduction. Note that this scene is entirely missing from the remake!

Alan Trustman made his (produced) screenwriting debut with this film and followed it up with two more blockbusters, Bullitt and They Call Me MISTER Tibbs!. Each of these featured young, very strong, very different men as the leads, struggling with a system that has no place for them. All very ’60s hip philosophically, putting the question of one’s meaning as the underlying inner question wrapped around by a very stylish, entertainment.

No less than the reason for existence itself is the inner question addressed. Trustman and Jewison set us up with a protagonist, I won’t call Thomas Crown a hero, who seems to have everything in life. Money, a big house, hobbies, success! Yet this isn’t enough and he sets in motion a daring multimillion dollar bank heist to feed his craving for thrills. As otherwise demonstrated by flying a glider recklessly, playing polo aggressively, and driving a dunebuggy with no regard for the flora or fauna. I was a little disapointed that the best ending they could arrive at was to pair off Dunaway and McQueen, sort of, with the suggestion that two such people could give each other the desired thrills. Then again, who has ever come up with anything better?

Absolutely recommended

Also posted in action, crime, movies, Recommended, Reviews | Comments Off